Commerce Language & Ontologies
Controlled concepts for principals, products, capabilities, state, authority, evidence, actions and outcomes.
Researching the language, data and protocol fabric that lets companies, countries, agents, machines and products understand one another.
Commercial systems often use different classifications, schemas, units, definitions and identifiers. Those mismatches create hidden economic cost and make automation brittle.
Interoperability can reduce repeated translation and reconciliation while preserving local and sector-specific meaning.
See the interoperability stackLinking commercial and regulatory evidence across borders.
Common concepts without erasing local context.
Protocols that allow diverse systems to exchange meaning.
We study the layers required to turn diverse real-world commerce data into a trusted, interoperable foundation for analysis and action.
Controlled concepts for principals, products, capabilities, state, authority, evidence, actions and outcomes.
Interoperable patterns for discovery, requests, offers, negotiation, authority, evidence, fulfillment and settlement.
Retrieval across structured data, documents, current state, rules and evidence.
Provenance-aware knowledge that preserves version, source, authority and contradiction.
Measurement and reduction of losses created by language, units, classifications and schema mismatch.
We study where information loses fidelity across language, units, classifications, identifiers and schemas—and whether those losses can be measured as economic friction.
Explore our methodsSame product, different commercial terms.
Dimensions and quantities translated inconsistently.
Different product or regulatory taxonomies.
Fields align syntactically but not semantically.
Commerce questions may require structured data, documents, current state, rules and evidence at the same time. Research should preserve authority and provenance across those sources.
Public standards and protocols may be released where ecosystem value is high. Internal data models, proprietary mappings and protected knowledge assets may remain private.